Sunday, February 8, 2009

Politics and sentiment do not mix if a person wants to be in a position where they do not have to identify with other people. According to the interview Steven Cobert conducts with Marjane Satrapi, the very purpose of Persepolis is for people to see the humanity of the Iranians. They have a sense of humor, they have families, they struggle to find their identity and they also do not always support the actions of their government. When the Iraqis first bommbed Iran, Marji responds to her parents as they read the paper "We have to bomb Baghdad." Her mother tells her to "Take your feet off the table, it's impolite"(82). This passage struck me because parents teach their children to share toys and play nicely with others. A code of conduct for decency toward our fellow man is taught to our children. Even during this discourse between mother and daughter the reader feels the irony of the lesson for isn't it much more impolite to drop a bomb on a persons home than to put a foot on the table?  Satrapi realizes that change begins in how people relate to one another on a small scale. These grass roots efforts spread and can work themselves into the mainstream. The next part of the discourse is about Marji feeling her dad is a defeatest because he does not take more action. The two celebrate together however when Iran begins to bomb Saddam back. This makes Marji feel like her father loved his country. There is a deeply rooted struggle in humanity for the need to be "right," to feel justice and the necessity for boundaries so what is "mine" is mine. If someone does something to you, you want to get them back! It is often called pride. This is where politics turns into patriotism which is a sentimental thing. It is very difficult to separate politics and sentiment because they feed off of each other. Many of the political agendas stem from emotional arguments and background. Satrapi then introduces the reader to Pardisse who lost her dad in the fight. Pardisse says, "I wish he [her father] were alive and in jail rather than dead and a hero"(86). The realities of politics are again reduced to a family. The reader is able to see how actual people are affected by policy. 
In the film, when Marji hits bottom she returns to her family; the place she identifies with. Marji's grandmother who always smells good because she puts flowers under her clothes has a very influential role on her. Marjane goes through a coming of age situation where she tries to deny who she is to the world around her. She comes to realize it is not by a denial of who you are that you will be of influence, but by accepting yourself and helping others to see the truth about that which they may fear that will bring about change. I think the woman in Marji's life helped her see this truth. As an adult she says she spends most of her time defending groups from other groups that are in disagreement; such as defending Iran to Americans and Americans to the French. It is by mixing politics and sentiment that people will think twice before going to war with a government that is actually a city-town-neighborhood and family. 

4 comments:

  1. We are definitely in agreement that the two mix and can not be separated.
    I love that example from the book with Marji's mother telling her to get her feet off the table, while Marji talks about bombing a city. Satrapi definitely succeeds in showing how similar the people of the US are to those of Iran even though the governments are so entirely different.
    The irony in the statement is also incredible and quite weighty. Showing how straight forward Marji thinks at such a young age. I don't believe she has yet fully understood that politics and sentiment do mix. It is something that progresses throughout the book as the revolution and war hits closer and closer home for her. At first she is a revolutionist. Full of the Marxist ideology and willing to fight for it. She doesn't think twice about the affects only the outcome, only what she sees needs to be done. But then as she matures politics and sentiment mix more for her and it is impossible for her to once again look at things quite the same way. She now fights for her people, instead of simply to change the government.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When you describe the exchange between Marji and her mother about the bombing and feet on the table, I didn’t even notice that part during reading. One of the things I really love about this memoir is the fact that there are so many ironies and subtleties, effectively used in a combination of language and images. You are sure to find something new in each reading. This situation also reminds me of how daily life in America has continued unscathed during this “war on terror”. Life for us during this war is in no way comparable to the daily life of people during the world wars. While many families and soldiers are affected, daily life here simply sees a thirty second blurb about the war on the evening news, before going on to thirty MINUTES of sports news.
    The women in Marji’s life are very influential on the strong, opinionated, and independent woman that she grows into. It’s her character that has made her evolve into the woman who would take it upon herself to start a “grassroots effort”. This is an effort, which at least I have benefited from, helping me see people in an unfamiliar culture on a much more personal and human level.
    I like that you said that politics and sentiment feed off of one another, because that is what makes the relationship so ambiguous and complex. Both are affected by the other and the term can be applied in several ways and contexts throughout the memoir. Unfortunately, I don’t think politicians feel that they can afford to adopt a human level of understanding.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You have a very interesting viewpoint on the mixture of politics and sentiment into patriotism. I had not thought of it in such a term. Although I am not sure their patriotism is directed exactly toward their government or if it is directed toward their country or perhaps toward their government for helping defend their country in that moment (although there were many casualties…). Though the Satrapi family did not agree for the most part about the decisions of their government, they still had a great pride for their country. I liked the contrast between her wanting to bomb Bagdad and her mother wanting her to get her feet off of the table. Manners just seem a little miniscule on the list of things that matter in a moment like that.

    I also like your quote from the girl whose father died. I feel that it summed up the sentiments of many Iranians in Persepolis. Very good work.

    ReplyDelete